Erica Gamester - Nature of Art: Aristotle
Nature of Art: Aristotle
In the second chapter of “The
Nature of Art,” Aristotle’s perspective of art is presented. Similar to Plato,
Aristotle contends that art is representative or imitative of some sort of
immortal form. The introduction establishes that Aristotle will be arguing from
a teleological perspective, seeking the goal or objective of art by analyzing
the various mediums. Specifically, this reading focuses on the function and
essence of Greek drama.
Greek tragedy contains six
elements: plot structure, character, style, thought, spectacle, and lyric
poetry. Epic and lyric poetry is utilized in order to create “garnished” language
as described in the reading. Emphasis is placed on the style and dramatic
presentation of this narrative, eliciting a purging or “katharsis” of emotion. This dramatic caricature of action and
dialogue reproduces emotion over and over again through the repetition of
performance. Hence, this recurring generation of emotion is also a form of
artistic imitation.
While the first record of Greek tragedy
approximately occurred in 500 BC, this dramatized style is inadvertently
comparable to modern events. For example, Princess Diana was a humanitarian
with widespread popularity due to his philanthropic efforts. Despite her
divorce from Prince Charles and her struggles with bulimia and depression, she
persisted as a prominent figure in the media. While attempting to escape the
paparazzi, Princess Diana was involved in a car accident and passed away at the
hospital hours later. While devastating and unique in its own perspective, this
series of events mimics traditional structure of Greek tragedy.
If everything is a copy of a copy,
is there anything unique or profound to be analyzed in art? Is the end goal of drama/tragedy to elicit emotion
repeatedly? How can emotion affect motivation?
Comments
Post a Comment