Taylor Duffy - Heidegger



10/11/2017


I remember learning about Heidegger last semester. He has a lot to offer about nature or art. He claims that art and nature is a revelation of truth. What we see, what is before us, is the real truth. Heidegger talks a lot about technology and how it is merely seen as a means to an end rather than the thing itself. How does this function? In what way can it serve me?


This speaks a lot about art. People often view art as how will this change me? How will this make me feel? It is difficult to take of our viewing lense and see art for how it is. Just the thing itself. Once we can appreciate art for what it really is then we will see a revelation of truth about what art really is rather than just its function for us.


This works with language too. We are constantly thinking about the signified of an object that applies to us and it differs between people because of our ideologies. For example, Helen Keller learned about her doll being called a doll and that comes along with a positive connotation, being that it was her toy. For another person, 'doll' might have a negative connotation because they are afraid of dolls. The signified is subject while the sign is the only thing that is the thing itself. It is the revelation of truth.







Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Paul Chung: Aristotle on Art

Aristotle believed that art is imitation, and that it is a good thing. It pertains to humanity in ways that connects humanity. Imitation to Aristotle is relational in that humans learn from such as children. Even artistic values such as tragedies (mimesis) help to fosters an emotional connection to humankind. For Aristotle, a good tragedy produces Kartharis. Which is essentially, purification through pity and fear. The notion of imitation as a good thing, falls relatively short in that imitation is the reproduction or copy of something else. Whether it is a good copy or not, it derives from non original conditions.
Read more

Taylor Duffy - Reconsidering the Spiritual in Art

11/30 The part in reconsidering the spiritual in art that really struck me was the quote that said, "It was an artistic experience of art - a sense of the easy and seamless merger of religious and artistic experience, their inevitable reciprocity." In other words, you cannot have religion without art, and you cannot have art without religion. This made me think of van der leeuw's theological aesthetics section in Sacred and Profane Beauty. He states, "It is completely true that genuine, great art is, as a rule, also religious art; genuine, noble expression of the beautiful is simultaneously expression of the holy." This quote truly explains what art is and should be. It should be a creation of the most raw and spiritual experiences we have in our lives. This at least applies to great or fine art. It should evoke this holy awakening in the viewer. This is why creating art like singing a song or painting a fine painting is considered worship. There is such a ...
Read more

Beauty of Simple Worship

Tonight I witnessed something truly beautiful. The campus ministry, Cru, gathered in the chapel full of new faces and fresh first year students. I was running late, but when I arrived I did not feel late at all. I felt overwhelmingly welcome, included and invited in by new and old friends alike. Community is a truly beautiful privilege in life. I walk through the doors and the worship team was leading the filled room in song. There were no microphones, but we were going to lift our voices and our instruments to glorify Jesus regardless of technical difficulties. The night went on and the speaker delivered a message on the call to love Jesus and to love each other, which is a beautiful message in and of itself. However, the time came to close in song. This was when I recognized something spiritually greater than myself, while still not of its own divinity. In this time I experienced the biblical meaning of church. Again we stood to lift up the name of God. I closed my eyes, for I did no...
Read more